2000-06-12 11:55:12 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <config.h>
|
|
|
|
#include FORMS_H_LOCATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "Dialogs.h"
|
2000-07-11 15:08:54 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "FormCitation.h"
|
2000-06-12 11:55:12 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "FormCopyright.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "FormPreferences.h"
|
2000-07-11 15:08:54 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "FormPrint.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "FormTabular.h"
|
2000-07-27 08:55:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "FormUrl.h"
|
2000-06-12 11:55:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __GNUG__
|
|
|
|
#pragma implementation
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dialogs::Dialogs(LyXView * lv)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2000-07-11 15:08:54 +00:00
|
|
|
dialogs_.push_back(new FormCitation(lv, this));
|
2000-06-12 11:55:12 +00:00
|
|
|
dialogs_.push_back(new FormCopyright(lv, this));
|
|
|
|
dialogs_.push_back(new FormPreferences(lv, this));
|
2000-07-11 15:08:54 +00:00
|
|
|
dialogs_.push_back(new FormPrint(lv, this));
|
|
|
|
dialogs_.push_back(new FormTabular(lv, this));
|
2000-07-27 08:55:59 +00:00
|
|
|
dialogs_.push_back(new FormUrl(lv, this));
|
2000-06-12 11:55:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// reduce the number of connections needed in
|
|
|
|
// dialogs by a simple connection here.
|
|
|
|
hideAll.connect(hideBufferDependent.slot());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dialogs::~Dialogs()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
for (vector<DialogBase *>::iterator iter = dialogs_.begin();
|
|
|
|
iter != dialogs_.end();
|
|
|
|
++iter) {
|
|
|
|
delete *iter;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*****************************************************************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. WHY does Dialogs::Dialogs pass `this' to dialog constructors?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. To avoid a segfault.
|
|
|
|
The dialog constructors need to connect to their
|
|
|
|
respective showSomeDialog signal(*) but in order to do
|
|
|
|
that they need to get the address of the Dialogs instance
|
|
|
|
from LyXView::getDialogs(). However, since the Dialogs
|
|
|
|
instance is still being constructed at that time
|
|
|
|
LyXView::getDialogs() will *not* return the correct
|
|
|
|
address because it hasn't finished being constructed.
|
|
|
|
A Catch-22 situation (or is that the chicken and the egg...).
|
|
|
|
So to get around the problem we pass the address of
|
|
|
|
the newly created Dialogs instance using `this'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) -- I'm using signals exclusively to guarantee that the gui code
|
|
|
|
remains hidden from the rest of the system. In fact the only
|
|
|
|
header related to dialogs that anything in the non-gui-specific
|
|
|
|
code gets to see is Dialogs.h! Even Dialogs.h doesn't know what a
|
|
|
|
FormCopyright class looks like or that its even going to be used!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No other gui dialog headers are seen outside of the gui-specific
|
|
|
|
directories! This ensures that the gui is completely separate from
|
|
|
|
the rest of LyX. All this through the use of a few simple signals.
|
|
|
|
BUT, the price is that during construction we need to connect the
|
|
|
|
implementations show() method to the showSomeDialog signal and this
|
|
|
|
requires that we have an instance of Dialogs and the problem mentioned
|
|
|
|
above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almost all other dialogs should be able to operate using the same style
|
|
|
|
of signalling used for Copyright. Exceptions should be handled
|
|
|
|
by adding a specific show or update signal. For example, spellchecker
|
|
|
|
needs to set the next suspect word and its options/replacements so we
|
|
|
|
need a:
|
|
|
|
Signal0<void> updateSpellChecker;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since we would have to have a
|
|
|
|
Signal0<void> showSpellChecker;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in order to just see the spellchecker and let the user push the [Start]
|
|
|
|
button then the updateSpellChecker signal will make the SpellChecker
|
|
|
|
dialog get the new word and replacements list from LyX. If you really,
|
|
|
|
really wanted to you could define a signal that would pass the new
|
|
|
|
word and replacements:
|
|
|
|
Signal2<void, string, vector<string> > updateSpellChecker;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or something similar) but, why bother when the spellchecker can get
|
|
|
|
it anyway with a LyXFunc call or two. Besides if someone extends
|
|
|
|
what a dialog does then they also have to change code in the rest of
|
|
|
|
LyX to pass more parameters or get the extra info via a function
|
|
|
|
call anyway. Thus reducing the independence of the two code bases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't need a separate update signal for each dialog because most of
|
|
|
|
them will be changed only when the buffer is changed (either by closing
|
|
|
|
the current open buffer or switching to another buffer in the current
|
|
|
|
LyXView -- different BufferView same LyXView or same BufferView same
|
|
|
|
LyXView).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So we minimise signals but maximise independence and programming
|
|
|
|
simplicity, understandability and maintainability. It's also
|
|
|
|
extremely easy to add support for Qt or gtk-- because they use
|
|
|
|
signals already. Guis that use callbacks, like xforms, must have their
|
|
|
|
code wrapped up like that in the form_copyright.[Ch] which is awkward
|
|
|
|
but will at least allow multiple instances of the same dialog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signals will also be a great help in controlling the splashscreen --
|
|
|
|
once signalled to hide it can disconnect from the signal and remove
|
|
|
|
itself from memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LyXFuncs will be used for requesting/setting LyX internal info. This
|
|
|
|
will ensure that scripts or LyXServer-connected applications can all
|
|
|
|
have access to the same calls as the internal user-interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
******************************************************************************/
|