lyx_mirror/lib/layouts/natbibapa.module

#\DeclareLyXModule[natbib.sty,apacite.sty]{Natbibapa}
#DescriptionBegin 
#This module adds support for using natbib together with
#apacite (the bibliography style need not be apacite--it
#         could be apacite, apacitex, or any bibliography
#         that works with both the natbib and apacite
#         packages.)
#DescriptionEnd

Format 49

Preamble
\usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}
EndPreamble

Provides natbib 1
update layout format 2012-12-30 17:35:23 +00:00			`#\DeclareLyXModule[natbib.sty,apacite.sty]{Natbibapa}`
			`#DescriptionBegin`
			`#This module adds support for using natbib together with`
			`#apacite (the bibliography style need not be apacite--it`
			`# could be apacite, apacitex, or any bibliography`
			`# that works with both the natbib and apacite`
natbibapa.module: fix a typo 2013-01-03 01:45:48 +00:00			`# packages.)`
			`#DescriptionEnd`
update layout format 2012-12-30 17:35:23 +00:00
Fix conflicting inset font defaults (bug #8874) This makes the defaults of Inset::inheritFont() and Inset::resetFontEdit() compatible. There is no user visible change except for the Chunk inset which does not produce invalid LaTeX after editing operations anymore. This is the safe version for 2.1.0, for later there are still open questions: - All insets with ResetsFont true should be audited: Is this really needed, or do they show similar editing problems as the Chunk inset? - Does inheritFont() need to be customizable in the layout file as well? - Is resetFontEdit() != !inheritFont() needed at all? I did not use change tracking for the docs, since I updated all existing translations. 2014-02-10 21:06:32 +00:00			`Format 49`
update layout format 2012-12-30 17:35:23 +00:00
			`Preamble`
			`\usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}`
			`EndPreamble`

			`Provides natbib 1`