This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
* \file GuiSelectionManager.cpp
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
* This file is part of LyX, the document processor.
|
|
|
|
|
* Licence details can be found in the file COPYING.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* \author Richard Heck
|
|
|
|
|
* \author Et Alia
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Some of the material in this file previously appeared in
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
* GuiCitationDialog.cpp.
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Full author contact details are available in file CREDITS.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <config.h>
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "GuiSelectionManager.h"
|
2008-01-14 19:52:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "GuiDocument.h"
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "support/debug.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using std::vector;
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace lyx {
|
|
|
|
|
namespace frontend {
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
GuiSelectionManager::GuiSelectionManager(
|
2007-09-05 20:33:29 +00:00
|
|
|
QListView * avail,
|
|
|
|
|
QListView * sel,
|
|
|
|
|
QPushButton * add,
|
|
|
|
|
QPushButton * del,
|
|
|
|
|
QPushButton * up,
|
|
|
|
|
QPushButton * down,
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
QAbstractListModel * amod,
|
|
|
|
|
QAbstractListModel * smod)
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
availableLV = avail;
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV = sel;
|
|
|
|
|
addPB = add;
|
|
|
|
|
deletePB = del;
|
|
|
|
|
upPB = up;
|
|
|
|
|
downPB = down;
|
|
|
|
|
availableModel = amod;
|
|
|
|
|
selectedModel = smod;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->setModel(smod);
|
|
|
|
|
availableLV->setModel(amod);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
connect(availableLV->selectionModel(),
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNAL(currentChanged(const QModelIndex &, const QModelIndex &)),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(availableChanged(const QModelIndex &, const QModelIndex &)));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(selectedLV->selectionModel(),
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNAL(currentChanged(const QModelIndex &, const QModelIndex &)),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(selectedChanged(const QModelIndex &, const QModelIndex &)));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(addPB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(addPB_clicked()));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(deletePB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(deletePB_clicked()));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(upPB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(upPB_clicked()));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(downPB, SIGNAL(clicked()),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(downPB_clicked()));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(availableLV, SIGNAL(clicked(const QModelIndex &)),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(availableLV_clicked(const QModelIndex &)));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(availableLV, SIGNAL(doubleClicked(const QModelIndex &)),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(availableLV_doubleClicked(const QModelIndex &)));
|
|
|
|
|
connect(selectedLV, SIGNAL(clicked(const QModelIndex &)),
|
|
|
|
|
this, SLOT(selectedLV_clicked(const QModelIndex &)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
availableLV->installEventFilter(this);
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->installEventFilter(this);
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-15 01:53:26 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::update()
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
updateAddPB();
|
|
|
|
|
updateDelPB();
|
|
|
|
|
updateDownPB();
|
|
|
|
|
updateUpPB();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::updateAddPB()
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
int const arows = availableModel->rowCount();
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndexList const availSels =
|
2007-09-05 20:33:29 +00:00
|
|
|
availableLV->selectionModel()->selectedIndexes();
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
addPB->setEnabled(arows > 0 &&
|
2007-09-05 20:33:29 +00:00
|
|
|
!availSels.isEmpty() &&
|
|
|
|
|
!isSelected(availSels.first()));
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::updateDelPB()
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
int const srows = selectedModel->rowCount();
|
2008-01-09 23:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
if (srows == 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
deletePB->setEnabled(false);
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndexList const selSels =
|
2007-09-05 20:33:29 +00:00
|
|
|
selectedLV->selectionModel()->selectedIndexes();
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
int const sel_nr = selSels.empty() ? -1 : selSels.first().row();
|
|
|
|
|
deletePB->setEnabled(sel_nr >= 0);
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-09 23:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::updateUpPB()
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
int const srows = selectedModel->rowCount();
|
2008-01-09 23:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
if (srows == 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
upPB->setEnabled(false);
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndexList const selSels =
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->selectionModel()->selectedIndexes();
|
|
|
|
|
int const sel_nr = selSels.empty() ? -1 : selSels.first().row();
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
upPB->setEnabled(sel_nr > 0);
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-09 23:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::updateDownPB()
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
int const srows = selectedModel->rowCount();
|
2008-01-09 23:06:16 +00:00
|
|
|
if (srows == 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
downPB->setEnabled(false);
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndexList const selSels =
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->selectionModel()->selectedIndexes();
|
|
|
|
|
int const sel_nr = selSels.empty() ? -1 : selSels.first().row();
|
|
|
|
|
downPB->setEnabled(sel_nr >= 0 && sel_nr < srows - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
bool GuiSelectionManager::isSelected(const QModelIndex & idx)
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
if (selectedModel->rowCount() == 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
QVariant const & str = availableModel->data(idx, Qt::DisplayRole);
|
|
|
|
|
QModelIndexList qmil =
|
|
|
|
|
selectedModel->match(selectedModel->index(0),
|
|
|
|
|
Qt::DisplayRole, str,
|
|
|
|
|
Qt::MatchExactly | Qt::MatchWrap);
|
|
|
|
|
return !qmil.empty();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::availableChanged(const QModelIndex & idx, const QModelIndex &)
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!idx.isValid())
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = false;
|
|
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::selectedChanged(const QModelIndex & idx, const QModelIndex &)
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!idx.isValid())
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = true;
|
|
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
bool GuiSelectionManager::insertRowToSelected(int i,
|
|
|
|
|
QMap<int, QVariant> const & itemData)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
if (i <= -1 || i > selectedModel->rowCount())
|
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
if (!selectedModel->insertRow(i))
|
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
return selectedModel->setItemData(selectedModel->index(i), itemData);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::addPB_clicked()
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndex const idxToAdd = getSelectedIndex(availableLV);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!idxToAdd.isValid())
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndex const idx = selectedLV->currentIndex();
|
|
|
|
|
int const srows = selectedModel->rowCount();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QMap<int, QVariant> qm = availableModel->itemData(idxToAdd);
|
|
|
|
|
insertRowToSelected(srows, qm);
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectionChanged(); //signal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (idx.isValid())
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->setCurrentIndex(idx);
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::deletePB_clicked()
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndex idx = getSelectedIndex(selectedLV);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!idx.isValid())
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
selectedModel->removeRow(idx.row());
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
selectionChanged(); //signal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int nrows = selectedLV->model()->rowCount();
|
|
|
|
|
if (idx.row() == nrows) //was last item on list
|
|
|
|
|
idx = idx.sibling(idx.row() - 1, idx.column());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (nrows > 1)
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->setCurrentIndex(idx);
|
|
|
|
|
else if (nrows == 1)
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->setCurrentIndex(selectedLV->model()->index(0,0));
|
|
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = (nrows > 0);
|
|
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::upPB_clicked()
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndex idx = selectedLV->currentIndex();
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
int const pos = idx.row();
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
if (pos <= 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
QMap<int, QVariant> qm = selectedModel->itemData(idx);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectedModel->removeRow(pos);
|
|
|
|
|
insertRowToSelected(pos - 1, qm);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectionChanged(); //signal
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
selectedLV->setCurrentIndex(idx.sibling(idx.row() - 1, idx.column()));
|
|
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = true;
|
|
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::downPB_clicked()
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
QModelIndex idx = selectedLV->currentIndex();
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
int const pos = idx.row();
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
if (pos >= selectedModel->rowCount() - 1)
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QMap<int, QVariant> qm = selectedModel->itemData(idx);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectedModel->removeRow(pos);
|
|
|
|
|
insertRowToSelected(pos + 1, qm);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
selectionChanged(); //signal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectedLV->setCurrentIndex(idx.sibling(idx.row() + 1, idx.column()));
|
|
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = true;
|
|
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//FIXME These slots do not really do what they need to do, since focus
|
|
|
|
|
//can enter the QListView in other ways. But there are no signals sent
|
|
|
|
|
//in that case. We need to reimplement focusInEvent() to capture those,
|
|
|
|
|
//which means subclassing QListView. (rgh)
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::availableLV_clicked(const QModelIndex &)
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = false;
|
|
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::availableLV_doubleClicked(const QModelIndex & idx)
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 18:51:02 +00:00
|
|
|
if (isSelected(idx) || !addPB->isEnabled())
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (idx.isValid())
|
|
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = false;
|
|
|
|
|
addPB_clicked();
|
|
|
|
|
//updateHook() will be emitted there
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
void GuiSelectionManager::selectedLV_clicked(const QModelIndex &)
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
selectedHasFocus_ = true;
|
|
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
bool GuiSelectionManager::eventFilter(QObject * obj, QEvent * event)
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-01-09 07:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (obj == availableLV) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (event->type() != QEvent::KeyPress)
|
|
|
|
|
return QObject::eventFilter(obj, event);
|
|
|
|
|
QKeyEvent * keyEvent = static_cast<QKeyEvent *>(event);
|
|
|
|
|
int const keyPressed = keyEvent->key();
|
|
|
|
|
Qt::KeyboardModifiers const keyModifiers = keyEvent->modifiers();
|
|
|
|
|
//Enter key without modifier will add current item.
|
|
|
|
|
//Ctrl-Enter will add it and close the dialog.
|
2008-01-09 07:19:26 +00:00
|
|
|
//This is designed to work both with the main enter key
|
|
|
|
|
//and the one on the numeric keypad.
|
|
|
|
|
if ((keyPressed == Qt::Key_Enter || keyPressed == Qt::Key_Return) &&
|
|
|
|
|
//We want one or both of Control and Keypad, and nothing else
|
|
|
|
|
//(KeypadModifier is what you get if you use the Enter key on the
|
|
|
|
|
//numeric keypad.)
|
|
|
|
|
(!keyModifiers ||
|
|
|
|
|
(keyModifiers == Qt::ControlModifier) ||
|
|
|
|
|
(keyModifiers == Qt::KeypadModifier) ||
|
|
|
|
|
(keyModifiers == (Qt::ControlModifier | Qt::KeypadModifier))
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (addPB->isEnabled()) {
|
|
|
|
|
addPB_clicked();
|
|
|
|
|
okHook(); //signal
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
event->accept();
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
} else if (obj == selectedLV) {
|
|
|
|
|
//Delete or backspace key will delete current item
|
|
|
|
|
//...with control modifier will clear the list
|
|
|
|
|
if (event->type() != QEvent::KeyPress)
|
|
|
|
|
return QObject::eventFilter(obj, event);
|
|
|
|
|
QKeyEvent * keyEvent = static_cast<QKeyEvent *>(event);
|
|
|
|
|
int const keyPressed = keyEvent->key();
|
|
|
|
|
Qt::KeyboardModifiers const keyModifiers = keyEvent->modifiers();
|
|
|
|
|
if (keyPressed == Qt::Key_Delete || keyPressed == Qt::Key_Backspace) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (keyModifiers == Qt::NoModifier && deletePB->isEnabled())
|
|
|
|
|
deletePB_clicked();
|
|
|
|
|
else if (keyModifiers == Qt::ControlModifier) {
|
This commit changes the way individual LyXModule's are represented, both internally and in the .lyx files. The earlier version represented them by their `descriptive name', e.g., "Endnote" or "Theorems (AMS)", these being the same names used in the UI. This was a mistake, as becomes readily apparent when one starts to think about translating these strings. The modules ought to be represented by their filename, without the extension, just as TextClass's are.
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2008-01-12 04:28:12 +00:00
|
|
|
selectedModel->removeRows(0, selectedModel->rowCount());
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
updateHook();
|
|
|
|
|
} else
|
|
|
|
|
//ignore it otherwise
|
|
|
|
|
return QObject::eventFilter(obj, event);
|
|
|
|
|
event->accept();
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return QObject::eventFilter(obj, event);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-09-05 20:33:29 +00:00
|
|
|
} // namespace frontend
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace lyx
|
This is one of a series of patches that will merge the layout modules development in personal/branches/rgheck back into the tree.
Design goal: Allow the use of layout "modules", which are to LaTeX packages as layout files are to LaTeX document classes. Thus, one could have a module that defined certain character styles, environments, commands, or what have you, and include it in various documents, each of which uses a different document class, without having to modify the layout files themselves. For example, a theorems.module could be used with article.layout to provide support for theorem-type environments, without having to modify article.layout itself, and the same module could be used with book.layout, etc.
This third patch just re-factors some code presently in QCitation*. (It also incorporates some bug fixes that have been committed separately.) We're going to use essentially the same set of widgets for choosing modules that is used for choosing citation keys, so we pull the controlling logic out into a new class, QSelectionManager. I did not make this a QWidget. That seemed to me to be overkill, and it would have made things much more complicated, I think...and I'm not all that experienced with Qt, anyway. Anyone who wants to do that is of course welcome.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@19860 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
2007-08-28 16:49:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-08-31 05:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "GuiSelectionManager_moc.cpp"
|
