anne/lyx_mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.lyx.org/repos/lyx.git synced 2024-11-22 10:00:33 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update notes.

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@32894 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
This commit is contained in:
Richard Heck 2010-01-08 18:44:35 +00:00
parent fab1494f49
commit 1ce79a0c63
1 changed files with 4 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
development/HTML/HTML.notes
View File

@ -10,27 +10,17 @@ TODO:
These insets work but still need work:
InsetBibtex: There are a few issues here.
- One is that the output is not very nice. This will be solved, though, by
a patch of mine I seem to have forgotten to finish. To get output that
accorded with the BibTeX style, of course, we'd have to parse the bbl file.
I don't know if that's worth it.
a patch of mine I seem to have forgotten to finish.
- Another issue concerns cross-references. At the moment, we simply use the
xref information for every entry, rather than listing the xref separately and
then referencing it. That should not be terribly hard, but it would take a bit
of work.
- A third issue concerns the labels. At present, we use the BibTeX key as the
citation label. It would not be too hard, I think, to use numerical labels,
in the way BibTeX does. To do so, we'd need to move the sorting routine out
of InsetBibtex so we could do it before we print the citations. See below.
InsetBox: The CSS isn't there yet.
InsetCitation: This has two limitations as of 20 XI 2009. The first is that we
ignore the citation style and output square brackets, no matter what. The
second is that, with BibTeX, we simply use the BibTeX key as the citation
string, thus ignoring numerical, author-year, etc. It will not be too hard
to make numerical work. To do this, we need to collect information on the
used citations, alphabetize them, and then assign numerical labels via the
BibTeXInfo::label() method. A similar strategy will work for author-year and
the like, but calculating labels will be more complex---unless we just parse
the bbl file, which of course is the only fully general solution.
second is that we only do numerical citations. It will not be terribly hard
to do author-year citations, but the complexLabel() routine in InsetCitation
will need adapting before that is possible.
InsetFlex: I think this one is OK, but it needs some testing.
InsetFloat: This seems to work OK, but it will need testing and tweaking. There is
also no CSS yet for these.