Fix bug #3199: change-next may leave empty lines behind

Using Cursor::setCursor or even BufferView::setCursor is often a bad
idea since it does not run DEPM. In this case (and other cases in
f&replace code) it is better to use BufferView::mouseSetCursor (which
should maybe be renamed...).
This commit is contained in:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes 2013-04-24 12:04:49 +02:00
parent 959d2c5264
commit 77bf805155

View File

@ -417,20 +417,15 @@ bool findPreviousChange(BufferView * bv)
bool findChange(BufferView * bv, bool next)
{
if (bv->cursor().selection()) {
// set the cursor at the beginning or at the end of the selection
// before searching. Otherwise, the current change will be found.
if (next != (bv->cursor().top() > bv->cursor().normalAnchor()))
bv->cursor().setCursorToAnchor();
}
DocIterator cur = bv->cursor();
Cursor cur(*bv);
cur.setCursor(next ? bv->cursor().selectionEnd()
: bv->cursor().selectionBegin());
// Are we within a change ? Then first search forward (backward),
// clear the selection and search the other way around (see the end
// of this function). This will avoid changes to be selected half.
bool search_both_sides = false;
DocIterator tmpcur = cur;
Cursor tmpcur = cur;
// Leave math first
while (tmpcur.inMathed())
tmpcur.pop_back();
@ -449,8 +444,7 @@ bool findChange(BufferView * bv, bool next)
if (!findChange(cur, next))
return false;
bv->cursor().setCursor(cur);
bv->cursor().resetAnchor();
bv->mouseSetCursor(cur, false);
CursorSlice & tip = cur.top();
@ -478,12 +472,11 @@ bool findChange(BufferView * bv, bool next)
}
}
// Now put cursor to end of selection:
bv->cursor().setCursor(cur);
bv->cursor().setSelection();
if (search_both_sides) {
bv->cursor().setSelection(false);
if (!search_both_sides) {
// Now set the selection.
bv->mouseSetCursor(cur, true);
} else {
bv->mouseSetCursor(cur, false);
findChange(bv, !next);
}