I do not commit the update to the following file since it has a
non-trivial change:
lib/layouts/jlreq-common.inc
I'll ask for confirmation on the list before updating that file.
The font inside the inset is inherited from the parent for LaTeX
export if this parameter is true, as well as on screen. Otherwise
the document default font is used.
The default value is true.
Update tufte layouts to use this tag for sidenote and marginnote flex
insets.
Increase layout format to 101.
Fixes bug #12238.
There is nothing in the diff besides the format number changing from
93 to 95. From what I understand, this is as expected since 93 -> 94
and 94 -> 95 just add new layout tags.
Updating the layouts makes it easier to test master. Otherwise, in
some use cases layout2layout can be run hundreds of times which can
make some things slow (e.g., opening documents or even opening the
advanced find pane).
Includes a test case useful for some of the previous commits (notes in abstract, PI escaping, counter warnings).
Still missing: marginal and side notes. Shouldn't they be ported to InsetMarginal?
This uses the InsetArgument interface to provide access to a document
part hitherto inaccessible by LyX: the part between \begin and the first
\item in a list (where lengths and counters can be redefined, for
instance).
Fixes: #11098
File format change, layout format change
This is an extra command used for sidenote citations. Since we do not
provide \cite with natbib (which tufte uses) as a choice, we use the
new AddToCiteEngine feature to add it.
File format change.
Fixes: #11150
Now layout files and modules can extend the cite engines or completely
overwrite them, and modify the cite formats.
Any CiteEngine definition in a layout/module will completely overwrite
those by cite engine files.
AddToCiteEngine will extend them (add if they do not exist yet).
Any CiteFormat definition in a layout will be preferred to those in cite
engines. CiteFormat definitions that are not touched by the former are
still active, though (so, as opposed to CiteEngine, a CiteFormat does
not completely overwrite those by the engine files).
Layout format change.
The current spelling is not strictly wrong, but flagged as unusual or
historical by some authorities. It is also found fault with many
spell checkers. Thus we decided to move to the more standard "-ible"
form once and for all.
See #10678 for discussion
This last part updates the layout format and changes collapsable color.
This will all also all be backported to 2.3.x, for the sake of backwards
compatibility (cherry-picking).
