Now layout files and modules can extend the cite engines or completely
overwrite them, and modify the cite formats.
Any CiteEngine definition in a layout/module will completely overwrite
those by cite engine files.
AddToCiteEngine will extend them (add if they do not exist yet).
Any CiteFormat definition in a layout will be preferred to those in cite
engines. CiteFormat definitions that are not touched by the former are
still active, though (so, as opposed to CiteEngine, a CiteFormat does
not completely overwrite those by the engine files).
Layout format change.
The current spelling is not strictly wrong, but flagged as unusual or
historical by some authorities. It is also found fault with many
spell checkers. Thus we decided to move to the more standard "-ible"
form once and for all.
See #10678 for discussion
This last part updates the layout format and changes collapsable color.
This will all also all be backported to 2.3.x, for the sake of backwards
compatibility (cherry-picking).
Remove the trimming operation on LabelString, LabelStringAppendix,
EndLabelString and LabelCounter. This trimming meant that quotes
strings were not preserved, which is wrong.
To preserve layouts, the Layout format has been updated to 64, so that
layout2layout can remove extra spaces on existing strings, which
ensures that behavior is unchanged for old layouts (courtesy of rgheck).
It is now possible to re-add spaces in label strings where it makes
sense.
Fixes bug #10723.
This makes the defaults of Inset::inheritFont() and Inset::resetFontEdit()
compatible. There is no user visible change except for the Chunk inset which
does not produce invalid LaTeX after editing operations anymore.
This is the safe version for 2.1.0, for later there are still open questions:
- All insets with ResetsFont true should be audited: Is this really needed,
or do they show similar editing problems as the Chunk inset?
- Does inheritFont() need to be customizable in the layout file as well?
- Is resetFontEdit() != !inheritFont() needed at all?
I did not use change tracking for the docs, since I updated all existing
translations.
Note: Anyone on *nix can do this by running development/tools/updatelayouts.sh.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@33028 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
Modules provided by Paul Rubin (#5880).
* Fix some minor module description issues.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@31885 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
Do free free to change the categories. I just did these ones for testing, really.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@31033 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
Actually, not all of these do contain counters, but my grepping
wasn't sophisticated enough to catch them. Not a big deal....
I don't think there are errors here, but if you see weird
behavior with counters in some file or other, it's possible I missed
something.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@26782 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
The changes that accomplish this part are in ModuleList.{h,cpp}, configure.py, and the *.module files themselves. This is a format change, and the lyx2lyx is in those files.
By itself, that change would not be major, except for the fact that we do not want the module to be represented in the UI by its filename---e.g., theorems-std---but rather by a descriptive name, such as "Theorems". But that change turns out to be wholly non-trivial. The mechanism for choosing modules was the same as---indeed, was borrowed from---that in GuiCitation: You get a list of modules, and choosing them involves moving strings from one QListView to another. The models underlying these views are just QStringListModels, which means that, when you want to know what modules have been selected, you see what strings are in the "selected" QListView. But these are just the descriptive names, and we can't look up a module by its descriptive name if it's been translated. That, indeed, was the whole point of the change to the new representation.
So, we need a more complicated model underlying the QListView, one that will pair an identifying string---the filename minus the extension, in this case---with each item. This turns out not to be terribly difficult, though it took rather a while for me to understand why it's not difficult. There are two parts:
(i) GuiSelectionManger gets re-written to use any QAbstractListModel, not just a QStringListModel. This actually seems to improve the code, independently.
(ii) We then subclass QAbstractListModel to get the associated ID string, using the Qt::UserRole slot associated with each item to store its ID. This would be almost completely trivial if QAbstractListItem::itemData() included the QVariant associated with this role, but it doesn't, so there are some additional hoops through which to jump.
The new model, a GuiIdListModel, is defined in the files by that name. The changes in GuiSelectionManger.{h,cpp} make it more abstract; the changes in GuiDocument.{h,cpp} adapt it to the new framework.
I've also updated the module documenation to accord with this change.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@22501 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
