These are just annoying. Note that the language mark cannot currently
be specified in a layout file, but it is not clear that there is a
need for that. Therefore I used the simple and hackish way.
Both lyx2lyx and LyX write output to the terminal, and it's helpful
to know which messages are coming from lyx2lyx. For example, before
this commit if we opened a document in LyX that has a newer file format than
lyx2lyx can deal with, we see the following output in the terminal:
Warning: 619: Format not supported.
Warning: Quitting.
Error: Document format failure
The first two lines (the warnings) are output from lyx2lyx, and the
third is output by LyX. This output was particularly confusing
because I first thought "LyX tries to quit if the document is too
new?", but in fact LyX still stays open; it just doesn't open the
document. After this change, the output is now the following:
lyx2lyx warning: 619: Format not supported.
lyx2lyx warning: Quitting.
Error: Document format failure
Issue discussed in the mailing list: when the EPS contains several images (Adobe Photoshop exports two of them, one being a low-quality TIFF for preview), two files are generated, none with the existing name (prefix: -0 and -1). Hence, LyX thought that there was an error.
This ensures that we use a consistent Python interpreter in LyX.
$${python} is replaced by the Python version found.
Users can apply this in preferences and use the same version defined by
LyX.
An inset that resets its font (like Footnote) does not care at all
about enclosing font. Therefore the real starting point is the class
default font. This avoid cases where the footnote contents is forced
to \normalsize.
It turns out that the Greyedout note inset, did inherit font but was
declared as not doing it. This commmit changes the definition by
adding \normalfont\normalsize so that no inheritance happens.
Note that actually \normalfont resets everything but the font size.
This does not matter for footnote (which has its own font size) and
greyedout (which is fixed now), but may matter elsewhere. Also, I do
not know what the situation with HTML is.
There is nothing in the diff besides the format number changing from
93 to 95. From what I understand, this is as expected since 93 -> 94
and 94 -> 95 just add new layout tags.
Updating the layouts makes it easier to test master. Otherwise, in
some use cases layout2layout can be run hundreds of times which can
make some things slow (e.g., opening documents or even opening the
advanced find pane).
