- use https in URLs
- remove unused code
- use variables if possible
- LyX 2.3.x won't support Windows Vista because Qt 5.9 does not and other third-party programs will follow soon
Since they are not supposed to contain versioned strings like LYX_DIR_VER,
it is sufficient to copy them instead.
Besides, they also may be non-utf-8 coded, which would also break the conversion.
- update the file list in Makefile.am
- don't try to build it via CMake because this requires more than CMakeLists.txt. If it should nevertheless be built via CMake the .cmake files need to be rewritten from scratch
- remove unused and outdated files
- update an SVG file
- also remove Qt5XML in the installer as it appears not to be used by LyX
- update to latest MikTeX installer which resolves some problems
- add a note that pdfview is not yet ready for full Unicode support
This computation did not make sense anymore since we began to put the
contents in the Row object. The fact that it worked was a coincidence.
Instead, we set rows as changed() on creation and reset that once they
have been drawn. This will allow in the future for a finer definition
of what to redraw or not.
Also update the PAINTING_ANALYSIS document
since a few months MiKTeX's package manager required the option "--admin" when calling it with admin privileges
- also register the .lyx21 file extension for LyX 2.3
- also update the LyXRC version number
The goal of this commit is to ensure that a processUpdateFlags call
that requires no redraw will not override a previous one that did
require a redraw.
To this end, the semantics of the flag argument is now different: its
value is now OR'ed with a private update_flags_ variable. This
variable is only reset after the buffer view has actually been
redrawn.
A new Update::ForceRedraw flag has been added. It requires a full
redraw but no metrics computation. It is not used in the main code
(yet), but avoids to compute metrics repeatedly in consecutive
processUpdateFlags calls.
The process is now as follows:
- if flags is just None, return immediately, there is nothing to do.
- the Force flag is honored (full metrics computation) and replaced
with ForceDraw.
- the FitCursor flag is honored and removed from the flags.
- the SinglePar update is added if ForceDraw is not in flags and only
the current par has been modified.
The remaining flags are only then added to the BufferView update
flags, and the update strategy is computed for the next paint event.
Finally the dubious call to updateMacros in updateMetrics has been
removed for performance reasons.
This should force the python executable to use the desired encoding.
The command is moved to a wrapper script to be able to set the environment
at make-run-time.
The goal of this commit is to ensure that a processUpdateFlags call
that requires no redraw will not override a previous one that did
require a redraw.
To this end, the semantics of the flag argument is now different: its
value is now OR'ed with a private update_flags_ variable. This
variable is only reset after the buffer view has actually been
redrawn.
A new Update::ForceRedraw flag has been added. It requires a full
redraw but no metrics computation. It is not used in the main code
(yet), but avoids to compute metrics repeatedly in consecutive
processUpdateFlags calls.
Finally the dubious call to updateMacros in updateMetrics has been
removed for performance reasons.
The current spelling is not strictly wrong, but flagged as unusual or
historical by some authorities. It is also found fault with many
spell checkers. Thus we decided to move to the more standard "-ible"
form once and for all.
See #10678 for discussion
This part only covers the usage in comments and the like. More to follow.
This will all also all be backported to 2.3.x, for the sake of backwards
compatibility (cherry-picking).
The export ja/lilypond_pdf fails because ps2pdf gives an error. It
is thus still inverted, under the category 'externalissues'. As
Jürgen discovered, ps2pdf succeeds if the -dNOSAFER flag is used.
Note that Kornel is seeing strange behavior with the sweave test,
and thus the label of that test might be changed soon (e.g. to
"unreliable"). For discussion, see:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=20171001032524.fr5xfngylththwv2%40steph
