QProcess::startDetached cannot provide environment variables. When the
environment variables are set using the latexEnvCmdPrefix, a console
window is shown every time a viewer is started.
On Windows, this reverts commit 5225821242.
Fixes: #9035.
it's easy to use the existing docstring routine, so I've commented
out the string version of lowercase I had introduced. I've left the
code in case someone else needs it later.
the name, in the hyperlink. Fixes bug #8792.
This also fixes a bug discovered while working on this code: The
params passed to GuiHyperlink were never used.
This is the result of the discussion on the list "2.1.0 Blocker". Thanks to
all contributors!
The main idea is to use thread-local storage for all static variables.
This solution does not need any mutex. For more details, see the comment in
unicode.h.
It is no longer needed, and it had a comment that it needed review...
Now anybody who tries to make a copy again is forced to think about it,
instead of trying and using possibly wrong semantics by accident.
The Messages::gui_lang_ variable is instantiated in the '#ifdef ENABLE_NLS' block. To prevent compile problems, we should also instantiate it when NLS is disabled.
Make sure that the configure script only checks features using the C++ compiler.
Also get rid of our last C files, since they are not compiled nor distributed anyway.
The path to the lyx binary is either <build_dir>/bin (CMake) or
<build_dir>/src (autotools). This means the po directory can be found one
directory up.
Since 00387b2a38 it is possible to construct a dummy Messages object
which does not translate at all. With the old gettext implementation, a
Messages object without a defined language would have used a language from
an environment variable. Therefore, the duplicate definition of _() is no
longer needed. This gettext removal was really a good idea!
This is done by handling explicitly a dummy Message object, where no parsing of mo file is attempted. This avoids in turn that the lyxerr object is used during initialization of a global dummy Message object.
With gettext, we have been forced to install .mo files at the right place in order to read them. Now that we have our code, the situation changes.
* Add new method Package::messages_file(code), when returns the right path, depending on whether we are running in place.
* In Messages class use that intead of the existing one.
Get the default language by a mix of QLocale and LyXRC::gui_language
Known limitations:
* encoding is supposed to be UTF-8 (the charset parameter is checked);
* context is not handled (implemented differently in LyX);
* plural forms not implemented (not used for now in LyX);.
* tThe byte endianness of the machine on which the .mo file have been
built is expected to be the same as the one of the machine where this
code is run.
When running the test, you'll get the following messages:
Testing ../../src/../lib/layouts/siamltex.layout...
Layout.cpp (268): Cannot copy unknown style `Enumerate'
Testing ../../src/../lib/layouts/svglobal.layout...
Cannot delete style `Dedication'
Testing ../../src/../lib/layouts/svjog.layout...
Cannot delete style `Dedication'
Testing ../../src/../lib/layouts/svprobth.layout...
Cannot delete style `Dedication'
These are no errors of Layout::write(), but they indicate problems in the
definition of the layout files.
Kornel, it would be nice if you could do the cmake part.
* report results in milliseconds instead of microseconds
* report total time spent in block, additionally to mean time
* cause compilation error with --enable-stdlib-debug
each failure.
There are several places I was not sure what to do. These are marked
by comments beginning "LASSERT:" so they can be found easily. At the
moment, they are at:
Author.cpp:105: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Author.cpp:121: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Buffer.cpp:4525: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we just return?
Cursor.cpp:345: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:403: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:1143: // LASSERT: There have been several bugs around this code, that seem
CursorSlice.cpp:83: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
CursorSlice.cpp:92: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
LayoutFile.cpp:303: // LASSERT: Why would this fail?
Text.cpp:995: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here?
