* Remove the UndoKind parameter in the general interface
* move recordUndoInset to Cursor
* remove one variant of Undo::recordUndo.
* get rid of Text::recUndo.
Additionally, move the code to write to a stream from Cursor to CursorData (so that debugging undo is easier). We loose x_target, but I am not sure it is important.
This is the second part of bug #9432.
Rename recordUndoFullDocument to recordUndoFullBuffer.
Separate the notion of recording changes to paragraphs and recording changes in buffer parameters.
Audit every user of recordUndoFullDocument and replace it with either recordUndoBufferParams or recordUndoFullBuffer. Add comments to identify remaining work.
* remove unused class TexStream.
* remove unused virtual method Inset::cellXOffset
* remove second argument of FileDialog constructor, which was actually
not used
* remove some dead local code
* remove some unused private members of classes
* in InsetMathNest::updateBuffer, fix the logic of a test
The code that checks whether the cursor was at the end of a row in
Cursor::upDowninText was not able to set boundary correctly. This
causes a hang in because the cursor got stuck on a line and there is an
infinite loop BufferView::dispatch when trying to go down.
The fix is to avoid using the watered-down TextMetrics::x2pos wrapper
around getColumnNearX and use the real thing instead.
Eventually, the last user of x2pos (InsetTabular) should be fixed and
the method should go away.
each failure.
There are several places I was not sure what to do. These are marked
by comments beginning "LASSERT:" so they can be found easily. At the
moment, they are at:
Author.cpp:105: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Author.cpp:121: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Buffer.cpp:4525: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we just return?
Cursor.cpp:345: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:403: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:1143: // LASSERT: There have been several bugs around this code, that seem
CursorSlice.cpp:83: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
CursorSlice.cpp:92: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
LayoutFile.cpp:303: // LASSERT: Why would this fail?
Text.cpp:995: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here?
This commit does a bit more than fix selection, since it saves the full cursor state
in the undo stack. This means that undo now restores:
* the selection
* the current font
* transient mark (shall we keep this one?), logical position...
In order to do that, it introduces an intermediate class between Cursor and DotIterator: CursorData.
The new inheritance diagram is thus
DocIteraator -> CursorData -> Cursor
CursorData contains all the members of Cursor that define the current position, but not the stuff
related to current view of dispatch mechanism. It may make sense in the future to move members
between CursorData and Cursor and to move some member functions to CursorData.
Now UndoElement uses CursorData for cur_before and cur_after, but not for the cell. The undo API uses
also CursorData instead of DocIterator.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6367
* Undo.cpp:
- rename cur member of UndoElement to cur_before
- add new member cur_after, which is set by Undo::endUndoGroup
- create a new Undo::endUndoGroup variant that takes a Cursor as parameter. We cannot get rid of the old one because it is used for LFUN_COMMAND_SEQUENCE.
* Cursor.cpp:
- use endUndoGroup(Dociterator const &) for dispatch
- update Cursor::endUndoGroup to pass cursor.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@40713 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
we will be cautious, of course). The problem was that we were issuing
the Buffer::changed() signal before we did updateBuffer(), and this
caused an inconsistency. The idea here is to defer issuing this signal
until we call processUpdateFlags(). We know we need a redraw if we've
deleted a whole paragraph.
This should work properly, so long as checkDepm is called from within
the dispatch mechanism. There may, however, be other paths, and I've
noted one explicitly with a FIXME in Text2.cpp. I've tested a few
different variations, however, and I haven't seen any problems. But if
we do run into problems, we can go ahead and do the update there that we
were previously doing in checkDepm itself.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@40352 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
THis is a consequence of the new AtPoint mechanism. In the old
world, recordUndoInset was called before INSET_MODIFY. I reintroduced
manual recordUndoInset calls in all places that matter. I suspect
that this issue should be revisited later.
Note that recordUndoInset can now take an optional parameter that tells
what inset is concerned. This is useful because the cursor can be
either just inside the inset or in front of it.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@36580 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
In particular, it makes paragraph breaks generate single \n in latex output
when ParbreakIsNewline is true
This means that it is not necessary anymore to use newlines to break lines.
Plain paragraph breaks can be used instead, like is done now in ERT/Listings.
This is mainly aimed at sweave support.
lyx2lyx support courtesy of Richard Heck
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@36163 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
This bug is related to the fact that the cusor remember the current font.
The on-the-fly spell status should really not be kept in the Font object, but
rather in metrics, IMO.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@35041 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
DispatchResult to store a flag that tells us whether we need a buffer
update or not.
So: If you find a missing one, go to an appropriate place in the
dispatch and call cur.forceBufferUpdate() or, if you don't have a cursor
but do have a DispatchResult, call dr.forceBufferUpdate().
There is one remaining call I could not move, in
TextMetrics::redoParagraph. But this looks like an emergency call when
the macro context has not been set. There are also a couple calls that
are connected with buffer creation that I commented out, since the same
call is done again almost immediately. But I'm not positive about those.
Now the nice thing would be to do the same for updateMacros().
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@34826 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
