These uses are inefficient (a loop really) and require that pit_type
is ptrdiff_t.
Instead, RandomAccesslist::constIterator is renamed to iterator_at and
a version adding a non-const iterator is added. Additionally, the
method retirns end() when position is equal to the size of the
container (see #11861).
lyx::next and lyx::prev are removed, and std::prev is used in the few
places where the code requires it (for no good reason IMO).
These uses are inefficient (a loop really) and require that pit_type
is ptrdiff_t.
Instead, RandomAccesslist::constIterator is renamed to iterator_at and
a version adding a non-const iterator is added.
lyx::next and lyx::prev are removed, and std::prev is used in the few
places where the code requires it (for no good reason IMO).
This commit does a bulk fix of incorrect annotations (comments) at the
end of namespaces.
The commit was generated by initially running clang-format, and then
from the diff of the result extracting the hunks corresponding to
fixes of namespace comments. The changes being applied and all the
results have been manually reviewed. The source code successfully
builds on macOS.
Further details on the steps below, in case they're of interest to
someone else in the future.
1. Checkout a fresh and up to date version of src/
git pull && git checkout -- src && git status src
2. Ensure there's a suitable .clang-format in place, i.e. with options
to fix the comment at the end of namespaces, including:
FixNamespaceComments: true
SpacesBeforeTrailingComments: 1
and that clang-format is >= 5.0.0, by doing e.g.:
clang-format -dump-config | grep Comments:
clang-format --version
3. Apply clang-format to the source:
clang-format -i $(find src -name "*.cpp" -or -name "*.h")
4. Create and filter out hunks related to fixing the namespace
git diff -U0 src > tmp.patch
grepdiff '^} // namespace' --output-matching=hunk tmp.patch > fix_namespace.patch
5. Filter out hunks corresponding to simple fixes into to a separate patch:
pcregrep -M -e '^diff[^\n]+\nindex[^\n]+\n--- [^\n]+\n\+\+\+ [^\n]+\n' \
-e '^@@ -[0-9]+ \+[0-9]+ @@[^\n]*\n-\}[^\n]*\n\+\}[^\n]*\n' \
fix_namespace.patch > fix_namespace_simple.patch
6. Manually review the simple patch and then apply it, after first
restoring the source.
git checkout -- src
patch -p1 < fix_namespace_simple.path
7. Manually review the (simple) changes and then stage the changes
git diff src
git add src
8. Again apply clang-format and filter out hunks related to any
remaining fixes to the namespace, this time filter with more
context. There will be fewer hunks as all the simple cases have
already been handled:
clang-format -i $(find src -name "*.cpp" -or -name "*.h")
git diff src > tmp.patch
grepdiff '^} // namespace' --output-matching=hunk tmp.patch > fix_namespace2.patch
9. Manually review/edit the resulting patch file to remove hunks for files
which need to be dealt with manually, noting the file names and
line numbers. Then restore files to as before applying clang-format
and apply the patch:
git checkout src
patch -p1 < fix_namespace2.patch
10. Manually fix the files noted in the previous step. Stage files,
review changes and commit.
Newer boost versions use complicated type traits for boost::next and
boost::prior, which do not work with the RandomAccessList iterators.
The long term solution is to use std::next and std::prev, for now supply
simple replacements for compilers that do not support C++11 yet.
each failure.
There are several places I was not sure what to do. These are marked
by comments beginning "LASSERT:" so they can be found easily. At the
moment, they are at:
Author.cpp:105: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Author.cpp:121: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Buffer.cpp:4525: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we just return?
Cursor.cpp:345: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:403: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:1143: // LASSERT: There have been several bugs around this code, that seem
CursorSlice.cpp:83: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
CursorSlice.cpp:92: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
LayoutFile.cpp:303: // LASSERT: Why would this fail?
Text.cpp:995: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here?
The LATEX_LIST_ENVIRONMENT and LATEX_BIB_ENVIRONMENT type paragraphs are
not yet implemented in DocBook export. However, we need to actively skip
these paragraphs in order not to end up in an endless loop.
The need for a LayoutPtr arises from the fact that (a) we do not want to give our clients a Layout &, since we do not want them to be able to change our Layout; but (b) we also need to be able to change which layout is ours. So we cannot store a Layout const &. Or so it seems to the compiler.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@23522 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
Sorry, Andre, but this broke not only the modules stuff but the general handling of TextClasses. I'm not opposed to doing this sort of thing, but it's going to be a little more complicated. I'll do it when I get a bit of time, or I can explain what the issue is here if you want to do it.
I'll separately re-commit some of the cleanup here.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@23189 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
Also a few cosmetical changes where I xould not resist.
Would be nice if the 'modules people' could verify that their baby
is strill alive...
git-svn-id: svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk@23154 a592a061-630c-0410-9148-cb99ea01b6c8
