There is nothing in the diff besides the format number changing from
93 to 95. From what I understand, this is as expected since 93 -> 94
and 94 -> 95 just add new layout tags.
Updating the layouts makes it easier to test master. Otherwise, in
some use cases layout2layout can be run hundreds of times which can
make some things slow (e.g., opening documents or even opening the
advanced find pane).
The "Default Text" argument is usually non-blank. If the user
desired to leave it blank, it seems that "Invisible" would be a
better choice.
Similarly, an action is usually specified for this layout to be
useful.
When a paragraph is empty, it was not possible to query what the left
margin would be for an hypothetical second row.
Modify TextMetrics::leftMargin so that it does not test
whether position is after the last position of the paragraph.
Cosmetics: set the size of label to "small" for Abstract layout in
standard classes and reduce the spacing between label and text.
Fixes remainder of #11939.
Since the first row may be indented, it is necessary to find out what
the left margin would be on the next row (even if this next row does
not exst.
To this end, modify TextMetrics::leftMargin so that it does not test
whether position is after the last position of the paragraph.
Cosmetics: set the size of label to "small" for Abstract layout in
standard classes and reduce the spacing between label and text.
Fixes remainder of #11939.
I'm sure I've missed some here. I tried to check the CLS files for
some of these, but since I don't use a lot of these layouts, it is
hard to catch them all.
Includes a fix when wrappers are used with empty paragraphs. The logic is probably wrong if two legit wrapped paragraphs have one empty paragraph in the middle. This is only for slightly convoluted cases... Wrapping decisions should rather be taken for a series of paragraphs at once, but it would be more complex to implement and would only solve very peculiar cases like these ones.
