Cmake's foreach command includes forms
foreach(<loop_var> IN LISTS <lists>)
foreach(<loop_var> IN ITEMS <items>)
foreach(<loop_var> RANGE ...)
We get the lines to be parsed by
file(STRINGS "${filepath}" lines)
If in the parsed lyx-file there is a line
containing only the single word 'IN', or 'RANGE', then
the command
foreach(_l ${lines})
can create a syntax error (at least with cmake1.16)
In fact, in file pl_Additional.lyx:12913 happens to have
such a beast.
(cherry picked from commit 7b44280da4)
Amend eec3d1eb,7568571a
We are trying to check if the resulting file after lyx2lyx
is compilable, we have to ensure that copying the original file
to the test directory does not mangle use_non_tex_fonts-entry.
(cherry picked from commit c9e62dec53)
Consistent with the ru splash.lyx, we invert the texF tests for the
ru example_lyxified.lyx, which was recently added at 69ef4bc1.
(cherry picked from commit dc06714adb)
This allows us to exclude matches of certain patterns in
invertedTests, ignoredTests, unreliableTests, and suspendedTests.
To use this new functionality, prefix "!" to the pattern.
This functionality serves as a workaround in some cases to not being
able to use advanced regular expression techniques, such as
"negative lookahead", with CMake's regular expression engine.
Output of "ctest -N" is unchanged by this commit.
This functionality will be used soon (see next commits).
Patch from Kornel Benko.
(cherry picked from commit 10cd5dd223)
The export ja/lilypond_pdf fails because ps2pdf gives an error. It
is thus still inverted, under the category 'externalissues'. As
Jürgen discovered, ps2pdf succeeds if the -dNOSAFER flag is used.
Note that Kornel is seeing strange behavior with the sweave test,
and thus the label of that test might be changed soon (e.g. to
"unreliable"). For discussion, see:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=20171001032524.fr5xfngylththwv2%40steph
(cherry picked from commit 0c7e5c115d)
Handle name may be arbitrary string mathing '[A-Za-z0-9]*'.
This is then used by appending to the commands for the control file.
For instance select 'Alpha' as handle for the control file 'abc'
'COAlpha: abc' ==> open 'abc' for write
'CCAlpha:' ==> close 'abc'
Could not find a suitable tex font for the following tests:
export/doc/uk/Intro_pdf4_texF
export/examples/uk/splash_pdf4_texF
export/examples/minted-filelisting_pdf4_texF
1.) Handle also 'LatexCommand inputminted' in lyxStatus.pm
2.) Add '-shell-escape' to the appropriate converters.
This applies only to the ctest-environment iff calling
the script 'prefTest.pl' in the build directory.
keytest.py: This gives the os some time to update the status.
All keys with modifier and all possible shortcuts are affected.
Shortcut use corrected in findadv-11-in.txt and findadv-17-in.txt
Now, before starting a test with 'TestBegin' in any *-in.txt file
we can create ne shortcuts used by this test.
Defining a shortcut:
UseShortcut "<shortcut>" "<function>"
Actually adding the new shortcuts to be used by the next lyx-session:
PrepareShortcuts
Use example is found in findadv-combined-in.txt
The UseShortcut-entries will be traslated into '\bind "<shortcut>" "<function>"'
and with the PrepareShortcuts-entry added to the active use file 'user.bind'
Function keys are sent to xvkbd as e.g. \[F15], so we should
not split a sequence like "\C\[F15]" into two text pieces.
(Do it like other keys not having a digit in their name (e.g. \[Return]) )
The controls are described in hello-world-in.txt as
Cr: not expected regex search pattern before next expected match
Cp: not expected search pattern before next expected match
See also findadv-re-04-in.txt for an example
In this test-case, searching for case sensitive and format considering
search is failing.
This test started failing after 8bf3d7bb. I did not look deeply into
why, because the corresponding de and es tests were already
inverted, and because in general we do not expect texF tests to work
well.
The controls are described in hello-world-in.txt as
CO: for control file open for write
CN: control notice
CP: simple search pattern
CR: regex search pattern
CC: close control file
The control-file will be used at the end of test by searchPatterns.pl
Suppose, we want to test a key sequence which should produce
logs in defined sequence. ATM, we use pcregrep to see, if
a pattern occurs in the log-file. This is OK, if using only single
tests with only one message to care about.
But it is not OK for combined tests.
As an example, the file 'findadv-combine-in.txt' is combining
tests findadv-re-01-in.txt, findadv-re-02-in.txt and findadv-re-03-in.txt.
This test runns here about 25 seconds, while the time for the other three
is about 144 secs.
(Most time is with starting/stopping lyx)
Often the relevant entry (e.g. /proc/xxxx/status) exists,
but is empty. This led to many tests fail, mostly at
the first tests after the start of the OS.
