Those two functions used two different hackish and buggy
implementation to know when the function is disabled. Replace that by
asking the containing inset whether it accepts inserting display math
inset.
Fixes bug #10033.
The old name conflicted with the newly introduced Inset::isTable.
Now the meaning is as follows.
* Inset::isTable() is true when the inset is composed of lines and columns
* InsetMathHull::allowsTabularFeatures is true when the current type of hull allows for tabular-like functions.
Remove in particular all comparisons < and >= involving HullType.
Add a guard to make sure that mutate() only operates on types it has been
designed for. Then I figured I could use this new knowledge to give feedback
when math-mutate is not implemented via getStatus(). (To test this, insert a
regexp in Advanced Search & Replace and try to change it into a standard
equation via the contextual menu.)
AMS align environment should have some spacing between odd and even columns.
Add a new virtual method displayColSpace() to InsetMathGrid, InsetMathHull and
InsetMathSplit.
A longstanding problem... (related: #1861)
The columns in AMS math environments have a fixed alignment (colAlign() in
InsetMathGrid.cpp). We set this alignment for display (Georg's
displayColAlign()) in InsetMathHull and InsetMathSplit. This is done according
to tests and documentation for the various environments.
There is also some mechanical code factoring via colAlign().
Finally, I disable setting the horizontal alignment in InsetMathSplit, which has
no impact on the LaTeX output, and has no longer any impact on the screen. (As
for vertical alignment I discovered that it was in fact customisable for
\aligned & friends! I hope that the more faithful interface will let other
users discover that too.)
This concerns InsetPreview, InsetIPA and InsetMathHull.
Caching such a value is bad when opening the same buffer in two views.
In this case, it is not necessary to remember use_preview_ at all,
actually.
Also remove private member dim_ which is not used and remove some trailing whitespace.
Fixes bugs #9085 abd #9957.
The tabular-features LFUN was merged with "inset-modify tabular" when
simplifying the tabular dialog at b5049e7. This choice later indirectly caused a
few regressions (#7308, #9794).
I reintroduce tabular-feature to allow more flexibility for user
commands, whereas "inset-modify tabular" is now reserved for the tabular
dialog. In particular, inset-modify tabular is no longer caught by math grid
insets. The name tabular-feature is kept to avoid renaming icons.
Known issues:
* After successfully applying a tabular command, the cursor is truncated to the
table.
* Note that the tabular dialog still has similar issues that are inherited from
the achitecture of the dialog menu. For instance the pref change can be
mis-dispatched to an inset inside a cell and cause an error, for instance:
Lexer.cpp (934): Missing 'Note'-tag in InsetNote::string2params. Got
tabular instead. Line: 0
Maybe the inset-modify LFUN should be modified to treat commands coming from
the wrong dialog (by checking the type) as unknown and undispatched so that
the parent can get it. In that case a non AtPoint variant of inset-modify
could be reintroduced in order to generalise tabular-feature. See:
http://mid.gmane.org/n4rdk1$efj$1@ger.gmane.org
AMS align environment should have some spacing between odd and even columns.
Add a new virtual method displayColSpace() to InsetMathGrid, InsetMathHull and
InsetMathSplit.
I have no clue why this was automatically committed, I just applied the path, nothing more.
This reverts commit bb5470b5d1.
# Conflicts:
# src/mathed/InsetMathGrid.cpp
# src/mathed/InsetMathSplit.cpp
AMS align environment should have some spacing between odd and even columns.
Add a new virtual method displayColSpace() to InsetMathGrid, InsetMathHull and
InsetMathSplit.
A longstanding problem... (related: #1861)
The columns in AMS math environments have a fixed alignment (colAlign() in
InsetMathGrid.cpp). We set this alignment for display (Georg's
displayColAlign()) in InsetMathHull and InsetMathSplit. This is done according
to tests and documentation for the various environments.
There is also some mechanical code factoring via colAlign().
Finally, I disable setting the horizontal alignment in InsetMathSplit, which has
no impact on the LaTeX output, and has no longer any impact on the screen. (As
for vertical alignment I discovered that it was in fact customisable for
\aligned & friends! I hope that the more faithful interface will let other
users discover that too.)
These features are active in DEVEL_VERSION when Debug is set to LATEX.
1. The TexRow information is prepended to the source panel.
2. Clicking on any line in the source triggers reverse search. (This would be an
interesting feature to implement on the user side, but we need a proper LFUN.)
WriteStream is now built from an otexstream instead of an odocstream, and
therefore counts lines in a TexRow. Calls to TexRow are added in relevant places
in math insets.
This finishes adding line tracking for math in the source panel and for forward
search.
Use the function support:truncateWithEllipsis() to shorten a docstring with
... at the end. Actually we use U+2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS instead of "..." when
automatically shortening strings. This is to be consistent with Qt's own
truncation and is much nicer on the screen.
This includes the bugs #9575 and #9572 regarding broken text elision in the
outliner.
Known issues (non-regressions):
* TocBackend::updateItem() should be rewritten to update all TOCs. (#8386)
* "..." should be replaced with … everywhere else on the interface (including
translation strings).
* We should prefer to rely on QFontMetrics::elidedText() to truncate strings
with an ellipsis whenever possible, or an equivalent for the buffer view
dependent on the font metrics. See the warning in src/support/lstrings.h.
* New TOC "math-macro". This means that math macros can now be accessed in the
outline pane in their order of appearance or in alphabetical order, and can be
searched using the filter.
* Lists of floats now show subfloats deeper in the navigation menu
* The arbitrary 30 element cut-off after which nothing is shown except "Open
Navigator..." is removed. Menus now have no limit in size, so Qt may display
them scrollable. In exchange, we always show "Open outliner..." at the
beginning. I tested for performance issues with a rather complex document and
it is fine; but this does not exclude corner cases with lots of TOC entries of
a certain kind. If necessary, populating the navigation sub-menu should be
delayed like the main menu.
* Elements that do not contribute to the output (e.g. in a note, a disabled
branch) are now preceded with a symbol indicating this status. (The machinery
was already there; I wonder why it was not implemented already.) I have chosen
U+274E NEGATIVE SQUARED CROSS MARK.
* Fix the contextual menus in the outliner (bug introduced at 94e992c5).
* Toc item now move to the caption when present, but first center on the float,
to prevent the situation where the caption is at the top of the screen and the
contents of the float is off-screen above the caption.
(Internally, the action of the toc items can now be customised)
* Fix the LyXHTML output. Disabled captions no longer appear in the list of
figures.
We introduce TocBuilder for building TOCs that take into account both float
insets and their captions.
* Floats without caption are shown with their content.
* Floats with a caption are shown with their caption, but clicking the entry now
correctly moves to the float and not to the caption.
* Subsequent captions produce additional entries in the TOC.
* Figures and subfigures are correctly ordered in the outliner.
* New TOC "senseless" for captions appearing alone (a bit like broken references
are still displayed in the menu and outliner).
* Disable LFUN_CAPTION_INSERT if there is already a caption in a listing
Known issues:
* Inconsistent output for includes located inside floats
* We should record the end of the float in addition of the beginning for a more
accurate cursor -> outliner entry conversion
When the cursor had idx > 0 (since math-display does merging anyways),
reset cursor to the start of the inset. This looks less strange than
setting it at the end.
Now at least the basic case of a displayed equation with cursor
somewhere at top-level is handled correctly.
The math-display lfun operates at top level in the math inset.
Therefore, when the cursor is in an inner inset, it will after the
lfun be moved at top level. Unfortunately, there is no way that I know
f to detect this in Inset::doDispatch.
Even if we could, as things stand, it is difficult to keep the cursor in the
inner inset, especially if the inner inset moves : this happens for
example when moving from eqnarray to inline maths.
Therefore this fix is the best I can think of now.
Fixes part of bug #9664.
We only look once for the definition of the same macro, but we have
to always check its arguments when the same macro appears more than
once in a math inset. So, move earlier this check.
The strategy adopted in bc47054b had some drawbacks related to the way
instant preview snippets are generated. See the subthread starting at
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg187916.html
for details.
The strategy adopted in this commit is that of adding macro definitions
only for the macros actually used in a preview snippet, independently
of whether some macro was already used in a previous snippet. In this way
the snippets don't need to be changed according to whether they are
compiled as a whole or separately from each other. This fact was causing
the regeneration of a preview snippet whenever the cursor entered the
corresponding inset, even if the generated image would have not changed.
The problem of defining or redefining a macro is taken care by the
python scripts.
The math parser could not handle multicolumn grids. This is a problem because
there is no true ERT in math (everything is parsed).
Now multicolumn cells are parsed correctly. The display is also somewhat OK,
but apart from that any multicolumn related UI is missing. Since the file
format change is now done the UI can be added at any later point. The most
important part of bug 396 is now fixed: tex2lyx does not create invalid .lyx
files anymore for formulas containing \multicolumn.
I updated the tex2lyx test cases that produce correct output. tex2lyx does
still produce invalid output for the test cases which are not updated because
of the previous format change.
Avoid that \newcommand[x] definitions of math macros are pushed multiple
times to the preview loader.
Redefinitions (via \renewcommand[x]) are properly handled.
Invoking a computer algebra system program for computing a selected
subformula has never worked (checked with all LyX versions back to 1.3)
and, moreover, in the presence of a selection things go awry.
This commit allows this computation by replacing the selected
subformula with the result of the computation.
If there is only one row, a new line should not be appended. If
there is more than one row, the new line should not be appended for
the last row.
For example, if in LyX there was "as you can see in $x$ there..." a
copy/paste would lead to a newline after "x".
This is mainly needed to reduce the amount of ERT if you convert AMS example
documents with tex2lyx. No GUI support is needed, since \notag is equivalent
to \nonumber.
This method is a proxy for LyXRC::preview that forces to forward
declare some wrapper around an enum...
Instead, two simple static methods previewMath() and previewText() are
introduced, that make the code much easier to follow.
each failure.
There are several places I was not sure what to do. These are marked
by comments beginning "LASSERT:" so they can be found easily. At the
moment, they are at:
Author.cpp:105: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Author.cpp:121: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Buffer.cpp:4525: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we just return?
Cursor.cpp:345: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:403: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:1143: // LASSERT: There have been several bugs around this code, that seem
CursorSlice.cpp:83: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
CursorSlice.cpp:92: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
LayoutFile.cpp:303: // LASSERT: Why would this fail?
Text.cpp:995: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here?
