LyX correctly gave a warning about mixing InTitle layouts: There was
a LyX note in a Title environment, then there were standard
environments, and then a Title environment. This setup caused
several missing elements in the PDF.
Simply changing the Title environment of the Note to standard solved
the problems: The PDF output is now correct and LyX no longer gives
a warning.
The module allows to use the subequations environment.
There is still a pending request to implement this environment
natively in LyX's mathed.
Contributed by Joel Kulesza.
- add new vector images (the SVG files are only the sources and are therefore purposely not added to Makefile.am)
On the lyx-docs list it was reported that our current images look old and pixelated and I agree, so that I just draw new ones.
If we call parser.parse_args(), thus with no arguments, the parser uses
sys.argv (because that is the default). We should pass argv since that was
the purpose of handling argv in the main function.
We pass argv[1:] since when parsing the arguments we always ignore the name
of the program.
Use the full power of argparse to declare the default value of the end_format.
If we call parser.parse_args(), thus with no arguments, the parser uses
sys.argv (because that is the default). We should pass argv since that was
the purpose of handling argv in the main function.
With these changes, equation numbers are shown properly on screen.
When setting is default, we guess the side using these two rules
* ams(art|book) and siamltex classes are leqno by default. This is
signalled because the classes provide "leqno" (in amsdefs.inc). If
there are other classes that do this in output, the relevant classes
should be updated.
* the language arabic_arabi also sets leqno by default. This is
currently hardcoded for lack of a better idea.
Besides, a few bugs are fixed:
* use mathrm instead of mathbf for numbers metrics
* set spacing between maths and labels in inches
Remove support for python 1.x (really)
This code has not been used for a long time, probably never, since some code
above requires at least python 2.4 to work.
I got to this code by running futurize from python-future. There are no
significant warnings, mostly are related with the division but since
we are dividing floats there is no change between python 2 and 3.
