If the reverse position corresponds to an inset, its paragraph id
does not follow the main text numbering. Typically, an inset has
only a few paragraph, so that we would jump near the beginning of
the document. In this way we at least jump at the beginning of the
inset.
If LyX does not know about a given file format, it may easily
happen that the format is recognized as "latex" and this causes
bug #9146. This patch limits the check for a latex format to
non-binary files. The strategy for deciding that a file has
binary content is the same as that adopted by the "less" program.
The problem is the use of cursor movement methods to update cursor.
Cursor::forwardPos() steps into insets, which is not always what we
want. The problem here is that there is a math inset just after the
accepted change, and that the cursor steps into it for some reason.
This code is a nightmare anyway.
Fixes: bug #9145
This regression was introduced by me at 8b66f9ce. I did not take
into account that a call to a python script containing $$s is embedded
within a separate python script. Thus, when commandPrep() is called it
only sees the call to the outer python script, and does not see the
$$s contained in that python script. It therefore did not substitute
for it. This fix simply calls commandPrep() directly before writing
the embedded command.
The Adobe EPS file format specification (TN-5002, currently available at
http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/ps/5002.EPSF_Spec.pdf) specifies
a binary version of EPS files with integrated preview, sometimes also called
DOS EPS binary files. LyX 2.0 did recognize these files unreliably by
extension, but since f4eae12d they are misdetected as latex (bug #9146).
This change adds proper detection for these files using the officially
documented binary header.
This is needed so that the new format number is actually used. Since the
conversion is a noop I did not update the layout files (more updates will
come).
trim_eol() assumes that a line always ends either with \n, \r, or \r\n.
This assumption is always valid except for the last line of a document, since it
may miss the trailing newline. LyX does not create such documents, bu they may
result from automatic creation tools, and LyX can read them, so lyx2lyx should
be able to read them as well.
Do not assert if an inset separator is the only item of a List
environment. Although it is a weird thing to do, both GUI and
latex output can deal with it.
This fixes a crash in examples/fa/splash.lyx when selecting text
representing menu entries. This happens because menu names are in LTR
English, while the inset itself is in RTL.
The problem is that the current code relies on the fact that
1. getColumnNearX and checkInsetHit share the same idea about cursor
position.
2. pos and pos + 1 are in general consecutive on screen.
It seems that 1. is wrong here (for reasons I did not try to
understand); the second assumption is definitely false with
bi-directional text. This makes editXY very fragile.
The new code should be more robust in this respect. The logic is:
* if checkInsetHit finds an inset, use its position,
* otherwise, ask getColumnNearX for the cursor position.
Fixes: #9142
When deciding whether a paragraph should be indented or not, LyX
only takes into account default layouts. This is wrong, because
an environment could be nested into another one and thus a following
paragraph would not be "default". With this patch all paragraphs
after an environment are correctly indented, independently of
whether their layouts are "default" or not.
The latex output (which was modeled following the previous wrong
assumption) is also correspondingly adapted.
This is mainly needed to reduce the amount of ERT if you convert AMS example
documents with tex2lyx. No GUI support is needed, since \notag is equivalent
to \nonumber.
This is a follow-up of bug #8967. The implementation is self-explaining, the
only part which needs a comment is lyx2lyx: Since a 100% correct solution is
not possible, it has been decided not to switch amsmath off in the forward
conversion if no other ams command than \smash[t] and \smash[b] is used, but
to consider it a bug that older versions do not load amsmath automatically for
these commands. In the backward direction it is easy to keep the document
compilable, so just do that.
In collaboration with Scott Kostyshak:
With Qt 4 we could use Q_WS_X11, defined by FindQt4.cmake. In Qt 5,
there is no FindQt5.cmake. Instead we now define our own variable,
QT_USES_X11 by using class QX11Info available only on X11.
(http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/QX11Info.html)
The main consequence of this improved support is that now the keytests
can be run (ctest -R "keytest") when LyX is compiled with Qt 5.
Before, with Qt 5 we did not know if X11 was available, which is
needed by xvkbd, so the tests were not enabled. Note, however, that
many tests fail with Qt version 5.2.1 because there was a change in
the event handling mechanism in Qt that causes xvkbd to be unable to
pass capital letters (so case sensitive greps in the tests fail). This
needs to be investigated and reported.
It currently does not make a difference that it is before
Adobe Reader in configure.py because as Enrico points out
on Windows the default viewer configured in the OS is used.
The firs tinvolves a thinko in BibTeXInfo::expandFormat. We were previously
counting passes through this routine, which means: one for every character,
more or less. So long strings would hit the "recursion limit". But what
we are worried about is an infinite loop caused by misues of macros, so that
is what we need to count.
This prevents the error we were previously getting, but it reveals a huge
slowdown when one tries to open a citation inset with a large nubmer of keys.
So we also limit the number of keys we try to process, and the length of the
string we try to display, when we are generating citation information.
I'm convinced that there is a deeper problem in how citation information is
generated (see the bug tracker for more info), but that will require major
surgery and a file format change
If a new paragraph is created just before a nested environment,
the indentation of the nested environment is not computed
correctly because the parindent of the previous layout would
also be erroneously taken into account. This would cause the
nested environment to move back and forth when something is
added to the new paragraph.
Instead of simply taking into account the layout of the previous
paragraph, it is better considering the layout of the environment
in which the previous paragraph may be nested. This makes the test
simpler and, at the same time, more robust.
