Updating all previews (even if only one has changed) is more costly
than I thought. Thanks to Guillaume for tracking down this
performance issue.
This reversion is related to the reversions at 358745d0 and
a7a14395. See also #7242 and #9855.
This reverts commit 29948eec26.
Updating all previews (even if only one has changed) is more costly
than I thought. Thanks to Guillaume for tracking down this
performance issue.
This reversion is related to the reversion at 358745d0.
See also #7242 and #9855.
This reverts commit 66f527e417.
WriteStream is now built from an otexstream instead of an odocstream, and
therefore counts lines in a TexRow. Calls to TexRow are added in relevant places
in math insets.
This finishes adding line tracking for math in the source panel and for forward
search.
* TexRow now computes rows from a DocIterator. In practice, the cursor
highlighting is now correct inside insets, it is no longer restricted to the
topmost level. It certainly also makes forward-search more precise.
* Added the option to disable a texrow when not needed, for perf.
* Fixed a bug where the last paragraph was not properly highlighted.
Limitations:
* TexRow still does not handle: math (e.g. multi-cell), sub-captions, inset
arguments.
These were all flagged by "(style) The scope of the variable 'x' can be reduced."
Narowing the scope improves readability, and if it is in a loop then the
compiler will be clever enough to produce efficient code, we do not need
manual optimization for POD types.
Newer boost versions use complicated type traits for boost::next and
boost::prior, which do not work with the RandomAccessList iterators.
The long term solution is to use std::next and std::prev, for now supply
simple replacements for compilers that do not support C++11 yet.
lyxfind.cpp(findNextChange, findPreviousChange, findChange, selectChange): factor the change-selection part out of the change-finding part
Text.cpp (acceptOrRejectChanges): call only selectChange
The problem is the use of cursor movement methods to update cursor.
Cursor::forwardPos() steps into insets, which is not always what we
want. The problem here is that there is a math inset just after the
accepted change, and that the cursor steps into it for some reason.
This code is a nightmare anyway.
Fixes: bug #9145
The two fixes here a obviously right, although it is not clear why they are sufficient to fix the bug. Anyway I cannot reproduce any crash with it.
* the first part just conditions a whole if/else to change_next_pos.changed(). Originally, only the if branch was concerned.
* the second part is to avoid calling CursorSlice::backwardPos() when position is 0. Doing this leads to an assertion.
each failure.
There are several places I was not sure what to do. These are marked
by comments beginning "LASSERT:" so they can be found easily. At the
moment, they are at:
Author.cpp:105: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Author.cpp:121: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Buffer.cpp:4525: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we just return?
Cursor.cpp:345: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:403: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:1143: // LASSERT: There have been several bugs around this code, that seem
CursorSlice.cpp:83: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
CursorSlice.cpp:92: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
LayoutFile.cpp:303: // LASSERT: Why would this fail?
Text.cpp:995: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here?
Using Cursor::setCursor or even BufferView::setCursor is often a bad
idea since it does not run DEPM. In this case (and other cases in
f&replace code) it is better to use BufferView::mouseSetCursor (which
should maybe be renamed...).
