False positive rate of hints is quite high. Although the includes can be
technically removed (due to other includes) they logically belong to the
header.
The script does the following:
All .cpp and .h files in the current directory and subdirectories
are checked to see which include statements could be omitted without
causing a build error.
Many of these omissions would not be desired. For example, currently
if you don't include Undo.h in Undo.cpp, there is no error because
Undo.h is included in Cursor.h which is included in Undo.cpp. But
clearly we do want to include Undo.h in Undo.cpp.
See #6305.
* report results in milliseconds instead of microseconds
* report total time spent in block, additionally to mean time
* cause compilation error with --enable-stdlib-debug
Move the handling of branch-(de)activate(master) to Buffer. This code was moved to Bufferview in [3a03e71c/lyxgit] because a cursor was necessary to call Undo::recordUndoFullDocument(). However, it turns out that the undo code is already prepared to handle an empty cursor (and do nothing in this case).
Therefore we do that and move the branch code to Buffer where it belongs.
Note that there was a bug in the previous code that broke undo support: recordUndo should always be called _before_ doing any change.
An iterator is typicall incremented passed the valid data into the 'end'
state. However, if this means that other functions are called with invalid
parameter, we should fix this.
This explains why fontSpan was called with pos==size() while this was not
expected to happen.
This patch reverts partly f5ad0c128a (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes; Get rid of
annoying warning message).
each failure.
There are several places I was not sure what to do. These are marked
by comments beginning "LASSERT:" so they can be found easily. At the
moment, they are at:
Author.cpp:105: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Author.cpp:121: // LASSERT: What should we do here?
Buffer.cpp:4525: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we just return?
Cursor.cpp:345: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:403: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here, or should we return?
Cursor.cpp:1143: // LASSERT: There have been several bugs around this code, that seem
CursorSlice.cpp:83: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
CursorSlice.cpp:92: // LASSERT: This should only ever be called from an InsetMath.
LayoutFile.cpp:303: // LASSERT: Why would this fail?
Text.cpp:995: // LASSERT: Is it safe to continue here?
The default sizeAdjustPolicy is AdjustToContentsOnFirstShow. As the
combobox is initially filled with all items, it will not change size if we
later remove the 'At Decimal Separator' item.
Using Cursor::setCursor or even BufferView::setCursor is often a bad
idea since it does not run DEPM. In this case (and other cases in
f&replace code) it is better to use BufferView::mouseSetCursor (which
should maybe be renamed...).
ps2pdf by default produces the PDF 1.4 format. The PDF 1.3 format was
released in 2000. PDF 1.4 was released in 2001. LyX specified 1.3 as
the output version in 2002 (c1541c22), perhaps because at the time
PDF 1.4 was only a year old so some viewers did not support it.
Before, if a user had "Group" checked in GuiRef and double-clicked
on a category, that category would be inserted as a (broken)
reference. Now, when a category is double-clicked, nothing happens.
If a label starts with ':' and 'Group' is checked,
the label is now shown under "<No prefix>" instead of
not shown.
Note that labels starting with ':' can be valid in LaTeX.
If "Group" is checked, "<No prefix>" is shown only if there exists a
label with no prefix. Before, it was shown even when it was empty and
even when there were no labels at all.
