This is done by implementing the clickable method. It is not possible yet to have the usual left and down arrows, because Qt does not implement them as far as I can see.
Factor the code that triggers row/column selection and fix the logic. Now it is possible to select also at the right of the tabular inset.
When several bufferviews exist for the same inset, the data that depends on the view width have to be BufferView-dependent. While this is the case for several mutable members of InsetCollapsable, some were missing.
This commit makes button_dim_ (renamed from button_dim) and openinlined_ bv-dependent.
Get rid of the hitButton function.
Remove the bv-independent geometry() method and implement editable() explicitely instead.
Fixes bug #9756.
"echo -e" is definitely not portable. Use a plain loop instead.
Also use the automake silent rule mechanism to make the generation of monolithic source files visible.
Remove in particular all comparisons < and >= involving HullType.
Add a guard to make sure that mutate() only operates on types it has been
designed for. Then I figured I could use this new knowledge to give feedback
when math-mutate is not implemented via getStatus(). (To test this, insert a
regexp in Advanced Search & Replace and try to change it into a standard
equation via the contextual menu.)
AMS align environment should have some spacing between odd and even columns.
Add a new virtual method displayColSpace() to InsetMathGrid, InsetMathHull and
InsetMathSplit.
A longstanding problem... (related: #1861)
The columns in AMS math environments have a fixed alignment (colAlign() in
InsetMathGrid.cpp). We set this alignment for display (Georg's
displayColAlign()) in InsetMathHull and InsetMathSplit. This is done according
to tests and documentation for the various environments.
There is also some mechanical code factoring via colAlign().
Finally, I disable setting the horizontal alignment in InsetMathSplit, which has
no impact on the LaTeX output, and has no longer any impact on the screen. (As
for vertical alignment I discovered that it was in fact customisable for
\aligned & friends! I hope that the more faithful interface will let other
users discover that too.)
The offending code appears to have been introduced a long time ago. My
understanding is that it is no longer relevant. Notably, it only appears on copy
and not on cut, which tells us that: 1) it should be safe to remove it, 2) we
should remove it for consistency.
As discussed on the list some time ago. cmake produces .po files already in
native line endings. Only autotools on mingw might produce wrong line endings
now, but I am pretty sure that nobody updates .po files using autotools on mingw.
cmake sorts the input files for lyx_pot.py internally, but autotools use a
shell pattern like *.ui on the command line, so the order may be different
on different machines. It is more robust not to require any sorting from the
caller, so lyx_pot.py sorts now internally.
While a one paragraph large collapsable inset (containing for example a tabular) could be very wide and trigger horizontal scrolling, the code that makes collapsable insets wide when they contain several paragraphs would actually make them narrower in this case.
Typical example is a wide tabular and a caption in a table float, where horizontal scrolling would not trigger.
(cherry picked from commit a879bc2575)
this would require another font package with several MB size for only one single word -> not worth it for the Tutorial. The other language versions of the Tutorial do already not use true small caps.
It is wrong to assume that direction is left-to-right when no indication exist.
Add a new enum with values LtR, RtL and Auto to be used as argument of
the private text() methods. When direction is Auto, let Qt decide how
the string shall be layed out.
This is reimplementation of 51ee267c. A direct cherry-pick was not possible.
Fixes bug #10169.
When the box has a special width, one should not consider that as a fixed width. Otherwise, due to implementation quirks, the width will be set on screen as 1 inch.
A better solution would be to actually set the width by taking in account the contents width, height ans total height. This is not very difficult, but I do not know whether it would workout well in the work area.
Fixes bug #10048.
