I had already noticed the above mentioned thinko and this commit
should have been part of [3285ce1d5/lygit] but somehow I managed
to lose it in the git branches game: do a branch for that, than
try a different thing in another branch, then rebase to avoid
merge conficts, and finally delete all unneeded branches. Well it
is too much easy to do the wrong thing and pick the wrong branch,
deleting the right one. I will never follow the git way anymore
and will do I was used to do with svn.
I introduced this bug in r40091 where support for empty dates was added.
I also noticed that the title_layout_found flag was not properly passed down
to all variants of parse_text*. Since this is rather a global variable I
placed it into the preamble class.
The test case of bug #8104 shows other problems as well, but those are no
regressions and will be fixed separately.
OK for branch?
Now that \lstlistoflistings is supported by InsetTOC, we should use that
instead of ERT. I could have updated the file format and directly used an
InsetTOC instead, but I was too lazy.
This is a patch from Scott Kostyshak. The problem it solves is as follows:
1. enable continuous spell check.
2. type a misspelled word and press space so that it has a wavy red underline.
3. right-click and choose a suggested replacement word.
4. press the backspace button.
Result: nothing happens. If you press the backspace button again, then it works as normal.
The selection code was added for the benefit of the spellchecker, but the code has been rewritten since then.
* Avoid undo step when using backspace in macro mode
* Use recordUndoInset when entering macro mode (if one enters something like \hline, the outer inset itself will be modified)
* Use recordUndoInset when pasting in an INsetMathGrid (same reason as above)
Both bugs above were due to a missing screen update. This patch
updates the current view after dispatching a lyxserver command
and thus solves both.
The patch is quite strightforward and the only difficulty was due
to the fact that the lyxserver needs the result of the dispatched
command. Now, GuiApplication::dispatch(FuncRequest const &) does
right this, but does not return the result, while
GuiApplication::dispatch(FuncRequest const &, DispatchResult &)
is called by the former but does not return the result. So, I
split the first one, isolating the code performing the update,
such that the second one can also update the current view when
the caller is the lyx server. When the action is initiated by
anything different from the lyx server, the behavior is unchanged.
It seems that parameterless macros are not wrapped into a MathAtom.
Rather than touching the macro code (which is tantamount to opening
a can of worms, IMHO), I prefer this solution.
